MY2022 data report

Fuel Smart 2022

What 946 vehicle configurations reveal about fuel consumption, CO2 emissions and smog performance

A clear look at how make, engine size, vehicle class and fuel type are associated with the efficiency and environmental measures reported for new vehicles.

Explore the findings
0.819 engine size / fuel use correlation
67% variation accounted for by the linear trend

01 / The dataset

The dataset at a glance

Each row represents a vehicle configuration. It does not necessarily represent a completely different model, and the data does not measure vehicle sales.

Vehicle configurations
946
individual records
Makes
39
manufacturers represented
Vehicle classes
14
from compact to pickup
Fuel types
4
groups compared

02 / Fuel efficiency

What shapes fuel consumption?

Three views reveal a broad pattern: fuel use differs across manufacturers and fuel groups, and rises strongly alongside engine size.

Finding 01

How does average combined fuel consumption differ across car makes?

Swipe horizontally to read the full chart, or select View larger.

Answer

Bugatti records the highest average at 24.80 L/100 km, while Hyundai records the lowest at 7.99 L/100 km.

Interpretation

The gap describes the configurations listed for each make, not a sales-weighted market. Differences may partly reflect the types of vehicles produced by each manufacturer.

Finding 02

What is the relationship between engine size and combined fuel consumption?

Select View larger to inspect the chart in detail.
Verified correlation r ≈ 0.819 Strong positive association

Answer

Larger engines are strongly associated with higher combined fuel consumption. The linear trend accounts for approximately 67% of the variation in this dataset.

Interpretation

Configurations with similar engine sizes can still have different fuel-use values. Engine size describes much of the overall pattern, but it does not explain every difference.

Finding 03

How does average combined fuel consumption vary across fuel types?

Select View larger to inspect the chart in detail.
01 E8517.693L/100 km
02 Premium gasoline11.892L/100 km
03 Regular gasoline10.125L/100 km
04 Diesel10.118L/100 km

Answer

E85 has the highest average fuel consumption. Regular gasoline and diesel are nearly identical in this dataset, differing by only 0.007 L/100 km.

Interpretation

Fuel type alone should not be interpreted as the cause of these differences because vehicle and engine composition also varies across the four groups.

03 / Environmental performance

How does environmental performance vary?

CO2 emissions and Smog Ratings describe different environmental characteristics. The charts should be read separately.

Finding 04

How do average CO2 emissions vary across vehicle classes?

Swipe horizontally to read the full chart, or select View larger.

Highest

Standard pickup trucks
309.4 g/km

Lowest

Small station wagons
192.5 g/km

Interpretation

Two-seaters average 307.3 g/km and standard SUVs average 302.3 g/km. Class is associated with substantial differences, but the class name alone does not explain every result.

04 / Smog ratings

A different view of environmental performance

The 100% stacked bars compare the internal distribution of ratings within each vehicle class, making differently sized classes easier to compare.

Finding 05

How does the distribution of Smog Ratings differ across vehicle classes?

Swipe horizontally to read the full chart, or select View larger.

Official rating scale

WorstBest
This dataset contains ratings 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7.
Two-seaters 51.0%

approximately have Smog Rating 1

Standard pickups 51.3%

approximately have Smog Rating 6

Interpretation

A higher Smog Rating indicates better performance. Smog Rating is not the same as CO2 emissions; the two measures describe different environmental characteristics.

05 / Key takeaways

Five findings worth remembering

Together, the five views show why efficiency and environmental performance need more than a single measure or category.

  1. 01

    Make averages span a wide range

    The distance from 24.80 to 7.99 L/100 km reflects very different mixes of MY2022 configurations.

  2. 02

    Engine size is the clearest relationship

    A strong positive association links larger engines with higher combined fuel consumption.

  3. 03

    Fuel-group averages need context

    E85 stands apart, while regular gasoline and diesel are almost identical in this dataset.

  4. 04

    High emissions are not only about size

    Standard pickups rank highest, but two-seaters follow closely despite their different class profile.

  5. 05

    Smog and carbon measures tell different stories

    Rating distributions vary within classes and should not be used as a substitute for CO2 results.

06 / Read with care

Limitations

These results are a useful description of one dataset, not a complete account of every vehicle in the market.

  • The dataset contains vehicle configurations, not sales-weighted market data.
  • Some models appear in multiple configurations.
  • Group averages can reflect differences in vehicle mix.
  • Observed relationships do not establish causation.
  • Results describe the MY2022 dataset and should not be generalized to every model year.

Expanded chart

Expanded data chart